Friday, December 27, 2013

Gold Latin Continued/Dance Language: "Overturn"


After my last post, I received a clarification question that I had originally intended to answer quickly.  I soon realized, however, that the subject was really too large for a short, bulleted answer, so I’m making an entire post out of it. The question was:

“Can you add when overturns are permissible for syllabus to your Gold [Latin] blog?  I believe I saw a lot of them in Gold [at DCDI] and wanted to check with you when they can be used.”

For those only interested in the short, bulleted answer, please scroll to the list at the end of this post.  Otherwise, please keep reading for some clarifying material.


 


As has happened in the past, I really can’t start answering the question until we nail down some terms.  I used the word “overturn” in my Gold Latin post, which was perhaps not the best choice, but this situation is another where we don’t have solid terminology that always refers to the same thing.[1]  What in the world is an “overturn?” 

In general, the Latin syllabus books give amounts of turn for figures, much like The Ballroom Technique does for Standard figures.  The Latin books also include a note towards the beginning of each book that says, “… in most cases a little more turn may be made to develop rotation … When a precise amount of turn is not given between steps it denotes there can be acceptable deviations to allow for individual speed of turn and expression.”  Not the most precise instructions.  While “acceptable deviations” is fairly open-ended, I think it’s safe to say that this provision allows for a SMALL amount of extra turn – 1/8, maybe ¼, not anything more obvious and significant. 

There are some instances where the Latin syllabus actually uses the word “overturn” for its own purposes.  A good example is in the Jive figure Fallaway Throwaway.  At Bronze, specific amounts of turn are given in the chart.  At Silver, Fallaway Throwaway gets upgraded to the Overturned Fallaway Throwaway, which turns more, but does so still with specific amounts detailed in the chart figure.  Then at Gold, we get the Development of Overturned Fallaway Throwaway, which adds further turn, but again, a specific amount.

The above example is not what I was referring to when I said “overturn” in my previous post, nor do I think it’s what my question-asker was referring to.  The tendency is for Gold dancers to put noticeable, extra amounts of turn over spins and occasionally three step turns.  A better word for what I’m describing might be “overspin,” though that could also cause confusion because a three step turn isn’t technically a spin.  For the purposes of the rest of this post, I will use overspin for lack of a better term.  Finally, when I say extra spin or overspin, I mean what most of us would probably call a “double turn.”  Double turns are not, usually, truly double; they are typically about a turn and a half, maybe a little less or more, whether on one foot or over several steps.





So to (finally) answer the question posed to me, here is a list of figures where overspins are specifically provided for (these are all for the Lady, except for two of the three spin endings of Fencing):

Jive
  1. Change of Places R to L Development (Allowed starting at Silver)
  2. Spanish Arms, Spin Ending (Allowed starting at Silver)
  3. Rolling Off the Arm, Spin Ending with R to R Hand Hold
  4. Simple Spin Development (?)

Rumba
  1. Fencing, Spin Endings (Man and Lady’s Solo Spin, Lady’s Under Arm Spin to L, Man’s Solo Spin to L)

Cha Cha
  1. Cross Basic Development
  2. Hip Twist Spiral
  3. Follow My Leader
  4. Foot Change Variations

Samba
  1. Three Step Turns

Paso Doble
  1. Traveling Spins (PP and CPP)
  2. Fregolina Ending
  3. Chasse Cape, Lady’s Spin to R Ending

Please note that, for the most part, these figures do give specific amounts of turn for their overspin actions.  As stated in my previous post, you still may not simply embellish turns by doubling them. 
    


[1] For further examples see the section of this post about elements/steps, and this post discussing open/closed.

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Gold Latin


Why does Gold Latin get its own post?  Simply put: in my own experience, Gold Latin contains the most instances of infractions of any level and style.  For whatever reason, dancers tend to go hog wild in Gold Latin events, and there are certain infractions that I could put money on happening and be much richer in a hurry.  This is a list of those infractions.

Man’s Spin (Jive)

A Simple Spin is an opportunity for the Lady to turn a whole lot on one foot in Jive.  Her leader does not get the same opportunity.  The exact wording of the technique book is, Man: “No turn on the Simple Spin.”  As the figure is described, the Lady turns and the Man closes his feet.

Sailor Shuffles (Jive)

Sailor Shuffles are an embellishment borrowed from American Swing, where they become legal at Silver.  They have a kind of coordinated drunkenness to them that suits Swing’s grounded character exceptionally well.  Many dancers replace chasses with Sailor Shuffles in Jive as a way to make the basic action of the dance flashier and more exciting.  However, Sailor Shuffles do not appear in the Jive syllabus at all.

Sailor Shuffles (Cha Cha)

I split Sailor Shuffles into two sections because the information about them is slightly different in different dances.  At Silver Cha Cha and higher, dancers may use a Ronde chasse – a figure whose action resembles a Sailor Shuffle in some ways.  Dancers may not, however, replace regular chasses with Ronde chasses simply because they want to, nor may they dance the American Style Sailor Shuffle at any point in Latin Cha Cha. 

New York/Cuban Break Variations (Cha Cha)

Some of the most common alterations in Cha Cha are timing and action changes in New Yorks, Cuban Breaks, and Split Cuban Breaks.  These changes include: holding 4, 1 instead of dancing a 4 & 1 chasse in a New York, or any time when the Man and Lady do not mirror each other.  The Man may not dance anything different from the Lady during these figures.  No lunges, no lines, no timing changes.  He must dance the mirror version of the Lady’s part.

“Chugging Turning to the Right” (Jive)

I put this in quotes because that is how I have most often heard it described by syllabus dancers.  In a previous post, I mentioned that one of the most common infractions in general is dancing an Open Continuous Tuck-in Turn or Tap on the Shoulder from Bronze Swing in Jive.  “Chugging Turning Right” is how a lot of dancers choose to describe the Swing figure.  Just to repeat: the syllabus figure Chugging turns left overall; there is no Latin version of an Open Continuous Tuck.  

Samba Roll Variations (Samba)

Good news: Samba Rolls are allowed at Gold.  Bad news: They are not allowed in Shadow Position, or with a cross-hand hold above the heads.

Sliding Doors Variations (Rumba)

A large proportion of dancers like to include a full turn for the Lady after her Cucaracha in Sliding Doors.  This is not permitted.  The Lady must step backward out of her Cucaracha rather than turning around into her back rock. 

Syncopated Basic (Cha Cha)

You are permitted to dance 4 & 1 of a Cha Cha chasse as a “close, close, side” action.  You may NOT dance the same action over the 2 & 3. 

Honorable Mentions: Continuous Locks and Double Spins

Continuous Locks (Cha Cha, Samba) are not allowed.  The syllabus is very specific about how many locks you may do and in what position before you need to dance something else.

Double Spins: This one is tricky because there are places in the syllabus where “overturned” turns are allowed.  Generally speaking, however, double turns are not permitted as replacements for single turns.        

  

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Quickstep Locks


One of the most common Quickstep infractions is dancing multiple sets of locks forward or backward.  Many people dance two (or more) sets of locks in a row because 1. Locks flow naturally into each other and 2. Multiple locks in a row send a couple flying down the floor, which is an attractive prospect especially for lower level dancers who do not yet have access to other figures that accomplish the same goal.  Furthermore, lock steps define syllabus Quickstep – a full third of the Quickstep syllabus involves locking actions – so more are better, right?   

On Back Locks, the book is very clear.  Precede for all levels: Progressive Chasse to Right.  Follows: Closed Impetus, Tipple Chasse to Right, Running Finish, with Tipsy to Right added at Gold.   Specific figures are spelled out in a way that clearly indicates a Back Lock may not Precede or Follow itself.[1]

As an additional note on Back Locks, we have the Natural Turn and Back Lock.  Though this figure gets its own chart form due to alignment differences and slight alterations in foot positions, a Natural Turn and Back Lock is basically just a Back Lock with a different entrance.  Therefore, I would classify 1-3 of a Natural Turn as a second Precede for a Back Lock along with the Progressive Chasse to Right.  (Follows for Natural Turn and Back Lock are identical to the Follows for the figure called Back Lock.) 

Forward Locks are not addressed so clearly.  Precedes are, “Any figure ending with the Right Foot forward Outside Partner.”  Follows are, “Any Natural figure” in Bronze, and a number of more specific figures in Silver and Gold.  What do we do with this?  If we go by the Precedes, Forward Locks should be okay to dance twice since they end RF forward OP.  If we go by the Follows, double locks would not be allowed, as a Forward Lock does not meet the definition of “natural figure” because it doesn’t turn to the right.

Discussions of specific technique book language are fascinating (to some of us!) and valuable.  However, in practical terms, the ambiguity of the book’s wording on Forward Locks doesn’t translate into much gray area for Invigilators.  Most Invigilators would likely call up couples dancing multiple sets of locks, so it’s best to avoid the problem entirely by dancing only one lock at a time. 






[1] By Back Lock, I mean the specific figure called Back Lock.  A V6 incorporates a type of backwards lock, but is not what I’m discussing here.  That being said, you may not throw an extra backwards locking action into a V6 either.  

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Dance Language: Closed vs. Open


Over the weekend of November 2nd and 3rd, I had the pleasure of Invigilating for Ballroom at Maryland’s Amateur competition, DC Dancesport Inferno.  This is my second year as Invigilator for DCDI.  Generally speaking, there were fewer infractions this year than last, but I wanted to mention something that jumped out at me this year. 

The biggest problem I encountered as an Invigilator was more about language than about dancing itself.  I found myself having a difficult time communicating with some of the dancers due to misunderstandings about the words “Closed” and “Open.”  When I considered it more, it occurred to me that in ballroom, we frequently use “Closed” and “Open” as terms meaning several different, somewhat unrelated things.

Closed vs. Open Event

Probably the most recognizable usage, Closed and Open when referring to events tell us whether or not the dancers must stick to a syllabus.  Closed events use a syllabus (or set of restrictions) and Open events do not. 

Closed vs. Open Dance Position

Closed and Open Dance Positions are ways of describing the Lady’s position with relation to the Man in every style except Standard (which has Closed but not Open). 

From the Latin Technique books produced by the ISTD:

“Closed Position
Facing partner, slightly apart, normal hold[i]

Alternative holds
  1. Left hand holding Lady’s right hand
  2. Right hand holding Lady’s left hand
  3. No hold
The couple may be a little further apart than usual when using these alternatives.”

“Open Position
Facing and away from partner, approximately at arms length.  Left hand holding Lady’s right hand

Alternative holds
  1. Right hand holding Lady’s right hand
  2. No hold
  3. Left hand holding Lady’s right hand and right hand holding Lady’s left hand (double hold).”[ii]

In brief, Closed means facing your partner and standing fairly close together, while Open could be facing or away, and at arm’s length. 

Closed vs. Open Foot Positions

Several of the difficulties in communication that I experienced revolved around the concept of Closed and Open foot positions.  I had to call up a couple for dancing International Foxtrot in an American heat (something I have previously written about).  Neither describing American Foxtrot as having “closed foot positions” or referring to Slow Fox as “passing the feet” effectively communicated what I was trying to say.  Smooth does have its own terminology for passing the feet – continuity styling – but I didn’t think using it would be helpful in this case.  The couple and I managed to get on the same page after some demonstration.  Demonstration is always essential as an Invigilator, but I found myself wishing I had a clearer way to make myself understood. 

In a similar vein, I talked to a couple who danced an Open Box in Bronze Rumba as opposed to the regular, and permitted, Closed Box.  Again, language became a barrier.  Even after I demonstrated what I meant, the vocabulary itself was still getting in the way, as one of the dancers asked me, “But we’re dancing in Closed, right?  How is that Open?” 

Closed vs. Open Age and Level

Typically competitions are organized by levels and age classifications as part of keeping things fair and equal.  Bronze dancers compete not just against other Bronze dancers, but dancers of approximately the same age.  Having Gold dancers compete against Bronze or eighty-five year olds against twenty-five year olds would be unfair.  Occasionally, though, competitions offer special events in which such restrictions are reduced.  As an example, “Master of Syllabus” events sometimes crop up at Amateur competitions.  In such events, anyone of any age or level can enter, so long as they stick to the syllabus in question.




  
Fair warning: I’m going to get pretty philosophical (and slightly less objective) here.  

Sometimes the language we use makes sense.  NDCA and USA Dance both say of Bronze Waltz that “feet must be closed on three.”  That seems straightforward to me.  However, we cannot effectively use a count to talk about Foxtrot.  Restrictions of “No Continuity Styling in Bronze” and “No Open left or right box turns” help only so much.  To make things even more confusing, Open Left Turns ARE allowed in Bronze Tango. 

Add into the mix the fact that International Waltz does not make a general shift from closed to open footwork as you increase level, but does add figures in which you don’t close on three, and International Foxtrot starts, middles, and ends with open footwork, and you have one incredibly potentially confusing system.  Then on top of that you have the Latin Rumba Basic, which doesn’t close, and the Rhythm Rumba Box, which does at Bronze but doesn’t have to at higher level.  It’s enough to give anyone a headache.


So my question is: How might we more effectively discuss and describe the various things we describe as “Closed” and Open?”    











[i] “Normal Hold” as described by the Latin Technique books: “The Man’s right hand is placed on the Lady’s left shoulder blade and the Lady’s left arm rests lightly on his right arm following the curve of his arm to the shoulder.  The Man’s left hand is raised in a gentle curve to the level of the eyes.  The Lady’s right hand is placed in the Man’s left hand with her fingers between his thumb and first finger.  The hands are lightly clasped.”
[ii] Latin American Dance Faculty Committee. Latin American Rumba. London: ISTD, 2003.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Cross-Style Dancing: Specific Figures, Smooth/Standard


Still having video issues, and completely swamped this week.  I will work on getting the videos for last week and this week ASAP.  


Besides observing the syllabus, transferring from American Smooth to International Standard has one ferociously obvious restriction that should be easy to follow: don’t break frame.  In some ways, though, this makes transitioning between Standard and Smooth more potentially confusing than between Rhythm and Latin because differences in similar figure are more subtle. 

Waltz

In a Chasse from Promenade Position in International Waltz, the Lady closes to the Man by the end of the figure; in American Style, the Lady remains in Promenade Position.  Furthermore, the Chasse from Promenade is the ONLY syncopation allowed at Bronze in American Style.  International Style includes syncopated figures Progressive Chasse to the Right and a Back Lock in Bronze as well.

Another stipulation of Bronze American Waltz is that feet be closed on the three (Chasse from PP is the exception).  This restriction means that an International Style Whisk is not permitted in American Style.  Instead, you must dance a Twinkle, where the feet close on three.

A simple Grapevine or Zig Zag is allowed in Bronze American Waltz but does not exist anywhere in the International Waltz syllabus.

Finally for Waltz, American Style allows a Forward Twist Turn to the Left from Promenade Position.  A twist action, turning right, is provided in the International Syllabus only as a possible Follow for the Left Whisk in Gold.  It does not exist as a figure on its own.  



Though Tango has a different basic action between styles, and Foxtrot is a completely different dance, I want to mention a few figures specifically anyway because a slight amount of figure overlap does occur.

Tango

In Bronze American Tango, you may dance a Twist Turn Left OR Right from Promenade Position.  International Style’s Twist Turn does appear in Bronze, but only turns to the Right.  

Right Side Fan is a Bronze figure in American Tango but does not appear until Silver in International Style, where it is called an Outside Swivel.  There are four methods of dancing an Outside Swivel; Right Side Fan most closely resembles Method Three.  Most importantly, a Right Side Fan contains two swivels danced back to back but an Outside Swivel may not Precede or Follow itself. 

Foxtrot

Where Foxtrot is concerned, American Style does allow two figures in Bronze that have similar “friends” at Gold in International Style.  Twist Turn to Left from Promenade Position and Zigzag/Grapevine are both Bronze for American Style Foxtrot.  Figures called Natural Twist Turn and Natural Zig-Zag from Promenade Position exist in Gold Foxtrot, but as I have noted before, are very different stylistically due to the strong difference of character between American and International Foxtrot.  Additionally, Natural Twist Turn comes equipped with four specific endings (and of course turns Right, as is indicated by the word “Natural”).     


Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Cross-Style Dancing: Specific Figures, Rhythm/Latin


Due to technical difficulties, video demonstrations of mentioned figures will be posted late.  I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion this may cause.

Last week I addressed dances that differ heavily between International and American Style, and I promised a further post regarding specific figures.  That is the subject for today and next time.  Generally speaking, International Style “translates” more easily into American Style than the other way around because International Style uses a set syllabus while American Style involves many syllabi and therefore relies on restrictions.  However, some American Style figures do resemble International Style figures, and this can lead to confusion, particularly when the figures in question do not appear at the same level in different styles.  

When you go from American Rhythm to International Latin, you run into a lot of what I might call level pitfalls.  What does that mean?  It means that many figures classified as Bronze, and sometimes Silver, in Rhythm are Gold or out of syllabus in Latin.

Swing/Jive

Sugarfoot swivels are allowed in Bronze Swing[1] but in Jive are Gold (Chicken Walks). Also, as described by recent changes, Sugarfoot can only be up to four quicks in timing in Bronze, while Chicken Walks can have variations in timings.  Sugarfoot timings may vary in Silver and Gold.

A Tap on the Shoulder or Continuous Tuck-In Turn in Swing is also Bronze and resembles the Gold Jive figure Chugging.  However, there is one major difference: the Continuous Tuck turns RIGHT overall whereas Chugging turns to the LEFT. 

Another form of swivel action, the Toe-Heel Swivels, are Silver in Swing but Gold in Jive.

Lastly, one of the most popular figures in Bronze Swing, variously known as Swing Kicks, Walks and Points, Back Walks and Points, Four Kicks, etc., does not exist anywhere in the Latin syllabus.


Cha Cha

Cha Cha also offers several examples of level pitfalls.  In Cha Cha there are a few figures that are actually quite different between Rhythm and Latin, but just similar enough on the surface to be confusing.  Parallel Breaks (also called Sweetheart or Cuddle), and Chase Turns are Bronze Rhythm figures.  In Latin, somewhat similar figures are Turkish Towel, Sweetheart, and Chase, and appear at Gold (Turkish Towel and Sweetheart) or Silver (Chase).

Both Turkish Towel and Sweetheart resemble Parallel Breaks in that the Man and Lady face the same direction. 
Key differences between Parallel Breaks and Turkish Towel/Sweetheart are:
1.     In Turkish Towel, the Man is in front of the Lady; in Parallel Breaks the lady is in front.
2.     Parallel Breaks is notable in Bronze Rhythm for being the ONLY figure in which the Man and Lady may be on the same foot.  In both Turkish Towel and Sweetheart, the Man and Lady are on opposite feet.
3.     Turkish Towel has a special entrance – an Alemana – and Sweetheart a special exit – ending in fan position.

Chase turns in Rhythm are danced on opposite feet for Man and Lady, while Chase in Latin puts the Man and Lady on the same foot. 











 


[1] NDCA allows Sugarfoot Swivels in Bronze.  USA Dance does not mention swivels one way or the other at Bronze, but includes a “Figures including swivel actions” allowance for Silver.  This suggests that swivels are not permitted at Bronze, but it is never explicitly stated.  

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Cross-Style Dancing: General Overview


Many collegiate ballroom programs focus heavily on International Style.  The nature of collegiate competitions being what it is, many dancers wish to enter as many dances, levels, and styles as possible with a variety of dance partners.  No American Style routines?  No problem!  Just dance my International routines, right?

Unfortunately, this way of thinking can lead to run-ins with the Invigilator.  In some comparable American Style dances, dancers can “get away with” dancing routines obviously from the International Style.  Body and leg action in International Cha Cha and Jive differ from American Cha Cha and Swing but conceptually the dances are quite similar (specific problem figures will be addressed in a future post).  Similarly, dancing International Waltz in American heats will be odd due to the lack of breaking frame, but mostly not prohibited (again, specific figures to come). 

Foxtrot is where serious problems occur.  International Foxtrot is characterized by progression; the full Foxtrot syllabus offers twenty-five plus answers to the question: How many ways can I get around the floor without closing my feet (heel turns notwithstanding)?  By contrast, American Foxtrot requires dancers to close their feet at the Bronze level.  Higher level dancers may pass their feet using Continuity Styling but the feel of the dance remains quite different from Slow Foxtrot.  American Foxtrot is snappy, upbeat, and jazzy – think grapevines, Fred and Ginger, rival gangs dancing in the streets.

Dancing International Foxtrot in a Bronze American Foxtrot heat WILL earn you a potentially uncomfortable conversation with the Invigilator.  You will not be asked to remove or change a figure; you will be instructed to scrap your entire routine.  You are much better off learning one or two American Style figures and dancing them over and over.  Your routine might feel less than exciting but at least it would be allowed!

Whether or not higher level dancers can score well dancing International Style in an American Style heat is Adjudicator, not Invigilator, territory.  Generally speaking, judges really want to see competitors dancing International Style in International heats and American Style in American heats – it’s part of the process and demonstrates that the dancers know their material.  It is true that “cross-style” dancing is overlooked more frequently in collegiate competitions, but dancers could still have difficulty achieving desired results without distinct routines for each style.  And of course, the higher level you dance, the more the judges will expect you to know the differences between styles. 

I do want to make a quick mention of dancing International Tango and Rumba in American heats.  Neither will earn you a trip to talk to the Invigilator, most likely, but dancing International Style Tango or Rumba in American heats is basically a bad idea if you want to do well.  In both cases, the core figures in International Style are different from the core figures in American Style.  Even though there are some similar figures, your routine will stick out in a way that is not likely to win you favor.  Much better, as with Foxtrot, to learn a few style-appropriate basics and run with them.